.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Saturday, May 21, 2011

queen elizabeth 1 portrait

queen elizabeth 1 portrait. young queen elizabeth i
  • young queen elizabeth i



  • techficiency
    Mar 29, 03:09 PM
    hilarious! balmer's standing around somewhere squirting himself into a false sense of security. microsoft is a dinosaur and about as hip and cool as an 8track.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. queen elizabeth 1 portrait.
  • queen elizabeth 1 portrait.



  • DRewPi
    Sep 3, 09:58 AM
    I would at least wait and see what happens this mid september with all the things that are to come !!!! Then if u really need the MB just go for it !!!!





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. June 14, 2006. Good Princess
  • June 14, 2006. Good Princess



  • bagelche
    Nov 14, 10:23 AM
    I'm just a regular iPhone user...not a developer. I just want my phone work. And I want the apps to be fully vetted and tested before they are available for download. RA's action doesn't make me dislike the iPhone, Mac computers, or Apple. In fact, quite the opposite. It makes RA look childish. I say...good riddance. Oh, and I'm also now less likely to purchase other software from RA. Just sayin'


    That's a shame, Mike, because RA's mac-based apps are fantastic. I use them all the time at the small community radio station I volunteer at. I admittedly have not tried their iphone app.

    Like you, I am also not a developer, just an end user. And as an end user, Apple's mishandled control of the gatekeeper role is incredibly frustrating. As an end user, if a program I'm using has a bug that can impinge on my ability to use it, I like to have a responsive system that fixes that bug. A responsive developer is important, but so is a responsive gatekeeper, if that role exists. Apple has repeatedly shown themselves to be a failure point in a system of their own devising.

    To a certain extent the issue isn't even if RA's use of these images was in violation of the SDK (though, of course that is a big issue), but, again as an end user, how is the system that's in place functioning to resolve the issues that matter to the common customer of the developer and Apple? Unfortunately there are very visible breakdowns in the process and I want to see those treated as serious bugs and fixed accordingly.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. The two portraits of Elizabeth
  • The two portraits of Elizabeth



  • DavidLeblond
    Aug 28, 02:00 PM
    If you walked into the Apple Store today and bought a 2GHz MacBook, it'd be the most current.

    Until tomorrow.

    Well, allegedly. ... More like in my dreams.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. National Portrait Gallery
  • National Portrait Gallery



  • DelisleBA.info
    Apr 22, 12:02 PM
    I hope they bring back the backlit keyboard.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. Queen Elizabeth in a portrait
  • Queen Elizabeth in a portrait



  • chuckles:)
    Oct 12, 10:27 PM
    i think it looks cool.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. 1600 Queen Elizabeth I:
  • 1600 Queen Elizabeth I:



  • Lara F
    Apr 16, 01:13 PM
    Are you also avoiding how I said it's too difficult for you to carry around an inch long adapter?


    Is it "difficult" to carry an adaptor? Of course not (weight and size wise).

    But in real life, you run into situations where you don't have it on hand. Like the noon conference at my residency program where we had problems with the laptop on which an attending was to give a presentation. One of the other residents had a MBP and volunteered its use, but...no DP adaptor to connect to the projector. I can only imagine how many times that scenario must occur each day at businesses, etc.

    It's a poor solution compared to having USB 3 built in.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. QUEEN ELIZABETH I PORTRAITS
  • QUEEN ELIZABETH I PORTRAITS



  • justflie
    Oct 27, 11:23 AM
    I may have missed this being said already, but just in case...

    Handing out flyers outside their booth area was just ONE problem, according to a Macworld article (http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/index.cfm?newsid=16291&pagtype=allchandate). Here's an excerpt:

    "There then followed a number of complaints about the behaviour of Greenpeace activists from four visitors and five exhibitors, one of which was Apple. Allegedly, Greenpeace attendees were invading other stands for mock photo shoots and replacing other exhibitors� promotional material with their own."

    So too bad Greenpeace, you pushed too far





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. Queen Elizabeth#39;s Images
  • Queen Elizabeth#39;s Images



  • hulugu
    Apr 18, 12:52 PM
    That's incredible! How can that be the case? Here it is 28 days paid days off if you work a normal 5 day week.

    Because we're a free people, unlike you socialists. We can choose to work longer hours for less money and no vacation, our jobs hanging on by the mercurial temperament of our betters. We prefer to work two jobs to make enough to keep the kids in diapers, driving two hours through traffic across crumbling infrastructure, and goddamn it if someone were to give us paternity leave.

    Because we're a free people.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. young queen elizabeth i
  • young queen elizabeth i



  • Funkymonk
    Apr 19, 10:48 AM
    And then Apple would ruin Samsung, cratering them with winning lawsuits. Also, Samsung would lose their reputation in the supply chain as well as their credibility, and it would likely damage the Korean economy as a whole, and South Korea politically as well. You're talking about one company causing problems for tens of millions of consumers, and a mountain of negative news. If Samsung wanted to be bankrupted within a decade, this would be a way, for sure.

    Lol do you know anything about Samsung? Do you know exactly how big of a company they are? good lord I feel embarrassed for you :(. just stop please just stop





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. Queen Elizabeth I, ca.
  • Queen Elizabeth I, ca.



  • andys53
    Apr 22, 02:12 AM
    How does streaming music to my iPhone help me, when O2 cap my Internet usage, and then charge when you use more.

    It won't, but if you have iTunes on a computer at home, it could save you on constantly replacing worn out hard drives before they crash and lose all your library.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. queen elizabeth 1 portrait.
  • queen elizabeth 1 portrait.



  • zacman
    Mar 30, 11:39 AM
    "Windows" was a generic term in the computer industry before Microsoft had any trademark.

    Yes, but that doesn't matter. The word Windows is no generic IT word, while app(lication) is. That's the difference.

    "Apple" can't be used to trademark a fruit, but it can be used to trademark a computer. "Windows" can't be used to trademark "windows of a house" but it can be for an operating system. "App store" can be trademarked for a brothel but not for a store that sells computer applications.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. of Queen Elizabeth I,
  • of Queen Elizabeth I,



  • guzhogi
    Aug 23, 06:26 PM
    I hope this means that Creative would port its Soundblaster X-Fi to Macs. I'm sure this would help bring game developers, too.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I
  • Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I



  • mmmcheese
    Sep 15, 05:58 PM
    A shame about scrapping the idea of a ground up design - I hope that doesn't lead to a lack of innovation. That's what really leads Apple along! Although if they just make a killer phone (I'm sure they will at some point...) it's bound to sell buckets loads!

    Uber

    This doesn't mean they will just re-brand a phone...it might just mean they are buying transmitters/etc. from other sources rather than engineering their own. Depending on what they buying "off the shelf," this only makes sense...why re-create the wheel?

    Of course they may end up just re-branding a phone, but that doesn't really seem like the Apple thing to do.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. queen+elizabeth+i+portrait
  • queen+elizabeth+i+portrait



  • MacFly123
    Mar 29, 03:07 PM
    2015... This just in, HELL FROZE OVER! LOL!!! :p





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. of Queen Elizabeth I,
  • of Queen Elizabeth I,



  • PinkyMacGodess
    Dec 30, 10:28 AM
    That's all I need... A cart load of false positives and spending 45-minutes scanning my iPhone before I can accept a call...

    NOT!!!





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. of Queen Elizabeth 1
  • of Queen Elizabeth 1



  • iMacZealot
    Sep 17, 11:23 PM
    Amen. the US dont use GSM, do they, it's CDMA, right?

    Here (australia) we have both, kinda. All carriers run GSM, and while there is some locking of handsets (if you get a "free" phone on a contract) you can pay it out early, or move to a different carrier when the contract expires, or just buy your own phone.

    I could NEVER imagine this whole "i want that phone by xyz carrier doesnt have it". Aren't you americans supposed to demand the best of everything!?


    Dear God, please check your info before posting. We have many GSM carriers, and you can buy certain CDMA phones and use them on a different CDMA network. And you were talking about international roaming in other posts, well, we have that, here. Even CDMA that you bash so much has roaming options. My brother is using a dual CDMA/GSM phone on Sprint right now in London. And the international roaming rates are cheaper with US carriers compared to Vodafone Australia, depending on countries. We also have 3G CDMA and GSM based Cingular uses W-CDMA, so you're not the only ones there, either.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. portrait of Mary, queen
  • portrait of Mary, queen



  • Doctor Q
    Sep 15, 06:43 PM
    Just to further clarify -- NIH syndrome is when a company chooses not to use technologies invented by other companies in its own products. They prefer to design and build the entire package themselves, in-house.

    I'm not that interested in an iPhone. Apple would need to add some very unique features for me to consider buying one.What if it supported NuBus cards?

    OK, that was a (bad) joke, since I think NuBus was one of those Apple-only inventions from the past.

    But why would you NOT want Apple's phone, szark? Is is that you don't want a camera phone or music phone in the first place, or that you expect it to be priced too high? Without knowing more about it, how do we know it's not going to be at least as good as the phones we have now? Plus an Apple logo.





    queen elizabeth 1 portrait. Queen Elizabeth I Portrait
  • Queen Elizabeth I Portrait



  • freebooter
    Sep 6, 01:16 AM
    Given the truly abysmal quality of Hollywood's 99% offerings, I say a big, "Who cares!" to any effort to pipe ever greater quantities of drivel into my life, however slickly and hyped.

    I do, however, look forward to a new 23" iMac--oh yeah!





    Zaqfalcon
    Apr 22, 05:24 AM
    Will this be able to be used on non Apple devices like iTunes currently is?

    Apple should invest in networks themselves to make these cloud based services viable vs larger built in storage.





    etoiles
    Sep 15, 08:19 PM
    It's been law in the whole country here for many years, not a stupid law at all and I've seen it enforced many times. If you're driving that's where 100% of your attention should be, just because you've got away with it before doesn't mean you always will.

    I agree.
    I should have said: the law has just been passed in California, sorry.





    wazgilbert
    Apr 28, 04:29 PM
    Yes I am. And fairly new to Apple (switched to Mac in 2006 and iPhone in 2007).

    Does being new here mean that I have to learn how a corporation that just recorded at record net income of $5.23 billion is "DEAD"? If so, please enlighten me.

    I have worked in finance for 35 years and only hold a Bachelors degree in Buisiness, but I'm sure from your response that you (and others here) know more about business than me. So please explain how the earnings report is an indication of impeding doom.... I'm always willing to learn from a group of experts!

    Typical Arts student! come back when you're qualified in Science or Engineering and tell us how manufacturing products that are worth selling works.

    Even the MBA crowd are appalling at their supposed specialty subject of business - that's just a euphemism for people who don't want to add value to something, but are skilled at counting the cost and value of things and are second only to accountants at removing the soul of a business in the name of making money.

    Oh yeah - you said it - qualified in "buisiness" [sic] but works in finance - surely that should read - holds some form of accountancy degree and is an accountant? No? under-qualified then. (or clerk)





    kdarling
    Apr 20, 10:30 AM
    I thought this was an FCC mandate (to track GPS information for cellphones) after 9/11.

    Not the date 9/11. Location is mandated for E911, the emergency call number.

    However, in ATT's case, that location is determined on the carrier side alone, not by way of the phone itself as is done on say, Verizon.

    Agree to that, but why is it being collected without permission?

    If it's not sent anywhere, then it's almost certainly a simple programmer screwup, leaving in test code.

    The data is actually collected by cell tower triangulation, not GPS.

    To use the cell method (and I doubt it's triangulation - but that's a different topic), the cell id must be sent to Apple's location server, which then returns the computed general center of that cell, which is in an area about 1/3 of the tower's coverage.

    The claim is that no data is going back and forth while the location is being collected, which makes no sense unless every iPhone has a huge cell database stored or cached internally. (Possible.)





    dvdhsu
    Nov 13, 01:26 PM
    Aplenty needs to clean up their act here.
    Rogue isn't a small homegrown company, they deserve to be respected. With policies like this, the App Store might just eventually die.